![]() ![]() Sentence fragment used deliberately for a persuasive purpose or to create a desired effectĭeliberate understatement, not to decieve someone, but to enhance the impressiveness of what they sayĪ type of deductive reasoning where the conclusion is predicated by the premises. Use of a word in such a way as to convey a meaning opposite to the literal meaning of the wordĪppealing to the audience by playing on their emotionsĪppealing to the audience by playing on their reason by using facts, statistics, and expert quotationsĭrawing conclusions from a body of facts making generalizations after observing a number of analogous facts For information on applications of rhetoric, see the articles broadcasting, communication, and propaganda. This article deals with rhetoric in both its traditional and its modern forms. In the 20th century it underwent a shift of emphasis from the speaker or writer to the auditor or reader. ![]() The yoking of two terms that are ordinarily contradictory rhetoric, the principles of training communicatorsthose seeking to persuade or inform. ![]() The juxtaposition of contrasting ideas, often in parallel structureĭeliberate omission of a word or of words which are readily implied by the contextĭrawing conclusions based on affirmative or negative statements The non-literal, associative meaning of a word the implied, suggested meaning of a word Substitution of some attributive or suggested word for what is actually meants The use of exaggerated terms for the purpose of emphasis or heightened effectĪ logical fallacy that means "after this, therefore because of this" The style of speaking or writing as dependent upon choice of words The study of the rules for the formation and patterns of formation of grammatical sentences in a language Insertion of some verbal unit in a position that interrupts the normal syntactical flow of a sentenceĪ figure of speech in which the part stands for the wholeĪn argument in brief that assumes the audience already believes on of the premises therefore, one of the premises is implied Similarity of structure in a pair or series of related words, phrases, or clauses Repetition of words, in successive clauses, in reverse grammatical orderĪsking a question, not for the purpose of eliciting an answer, but for the purpose of asserting or denying something obliquelyĪppealing to the audience using the speaker/writers' character and credibility The strict, literal, dictionary definition of a wordĭeliberate omission of conjunctions between a series of related clauses an appeal to the emotion e.A logical fallacy that means "argument toward the man" this fallacy switches the discussion from the question of issues to the question of personalities. an appeal to the credibility of the speaker d. the emotion that a speaker demonstrates towards his or her subject c. Match the definition with the appropriate word. the emotional association a word invokes Questions 45-49. rhetorical devices that rely on faulty reasoning e. parts of a presentation that augment the words d. making assertions about a group that are too broad. The description says Questions 2-6 are for Lesson 1: Prewriting: Persuasive Writing No questions for Lesson 2: Preparation: Choose a Topic and Develop a Thesis Questions 7- 11 are for Lesson 3: Preparation: Develop Arguments No questions for Lesson 4: Writing Workshop: Persuasive Speech: Outline No questions for Lesson 5: Revising Your Speech Questions 12- 16 are for Lesson 6: Public Speaking Questions 17- 21 are for Lesson 7: Presentation Questions 22-26 are for Lesson 8: Critical Listening Skills No questions for Lesson 9: Nonfiction: Persuasion Unit Review Question 37- 50 are for Lesson 10: Nonfiction: Persuasion Unit Test Questions 40-44.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |